Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62018TN0036

    Case T-36/18: Action brought on 22 January 2018 — Asahi Intecc v EUIPO — Celesio (Celeson)

    IO C 104, 19.3.2018, p. 48–49 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    19.3.2018   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 104/48

    Action brought on 22 January 2018 — Asahi Intecc v EUIPO — Celesio (Celeson)

    (Case T-36/18)

    (2018/C 104/61)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Asahi Intecc Co. Ltd (Nagoya City, Japan) (represented by: T. Schmidpeter, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Celesio AG (Stuttgart, Germany)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

    Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the mark ‘Celeson’ – International registration designating the European Union No 1 254 798

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 November 2017 in Case R 1004/2017-4

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    reject the opposition No B 2 644 816 filed by McKesson Europe AG (formerly Celesion AG) to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark Celeson applied for by the applicant;

    —

    order EUIPO to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Court;

    —

    order EUIPO and McKesson Europe AG (formerly Celesion AG) each to pay half of the costs necessarily incurred by the applicant for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Artcile 8(1)(b) Regulation No 2017/1001.
    Top