This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018CN0657
Case C-657/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Novom Zagrebu (Croatia) lodged on 19 October 2018 — Hrvatska radiotelevizija v TY
Case C-657/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Novom Zagrebu (Croatia) lodged on 19 October 2018 — Hrvatska radiotelevizija v TY
Case C-657/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Novom Zagrebu (Croatia) lodged on 19 October 2018 — Hrvatska radiotelevizija v TY
IO C 4, 7.1.2019, p. 17–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
7.1.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 4/17 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Općinski sud u Novom Zagrebu (Croatia) lodged on 19 October 2018 — Hrvatska radiotelevizija v TY
(Case C-657/18)
(2019/C 4/23)
Language of the case: Croatian
Referring court
Općinski sud u Novom Zagrebu
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Hrvatska radiotelevizija
Defendant: TY
Questions referred
1. |
Is Article 1 of the Ovršni zakon (Law on enforcement, published in Narodne novine No 112/12, 25/13, 93/14, 55/16 and 73/17), a provision of national legislation which empowers notaries to enforce debts on the basis of an authentic document by issuing an enforcement order, such as a writ of execution, without the express consent of the debtor against whom enforcement is sought, in accordance with Article 6(1) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and Article 18 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, having regard to the judgments of the Court in Cases C-484/15 and C-551/15? |
2. |
Should the interpretation given in the judgments of the Court of 9 March 2017, Zulfikarpašić (C-484/15, EU:C:2017:199) and Pula Parking (C-551/15, EU:C:2017:193) be applied in the present case, Povrv-2032/17, which the referring court must hear and determine? |