Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62017TN0618

Case T-618/17: Action brought on 8 September 2017 — Activa Minoristas del Popular v ECB and SRB

IO C 13, 15.1.2018, p. 19–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

15.1.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/19

Action brought on 8 September 2017 — Activa Minoristas del Popular v ECB and SRB

(Case T-618/17)

(2018/C 013/32)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Activa Minoristas del Popular. Asociación para la tutela de los inversores minoristas afectados por la resolución, supervisión y gestión del Banco Popular (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: C. Arredondo Diaz, lawyer)

Defendants: European Central Bank and Single Resolution Board

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

—

Declare the present action admissible;

—

Declare that the defendant has a right of access to the file on which the contested resolutions are based;

—

Annul the contested decision of the Single Resolution Board and declare that it is null and void as from the date of its adoption and, in the alternative, if annulment is impossible, declare that the applicant is entitled to compensation for the harm caused by that decision;

—

Order the defendants to pay the costs incurred by the applicant, as well as the costs that it may incur up to the General Court’s final ruling.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.

Top