EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62017TN0138
Case T-138/17: Action brought on 28 February 2017 — Prim v EUIPO — Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik (PRIMED)
Case T-138/17: Action brought on 28 February 2017 — Prim v EUIPO — Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik (PRIMED)
Case T-138/17: Action brought on 28 February 2017 — Prim v EUIPO — Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik (PRIMED)
IO C 129, 24.4.2017, p. 29–30
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.4.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 129/29 |
Action brought on 28 February 2017 — Prim v EUIPO — Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik (PRIMED)
(Case T-138/17)
(2017/C 129/44)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Prim, SA (Móstoles, Spain) (represented by: L. Broschat García, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik GmbH (Halberstadt, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘PRIMED’ No 5 154 182
Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 December 2016 in Joined Cases R 2494/2015-4 and R 163/2016-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO and the intervener to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009. |