EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62014FA0032
Case F-32/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — DO v ESMA (Civil service — ESMA staff — Member of the temporary staff — Non-renewal of contract — Staff report — Delay in drawing up staff report — Inconsistency of general and specific assessments)
Case F-32/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — DO v ESMA (Civil service — ESMA staff — Member of the temporary staff — Non-renewal of contract — Staff report — Delay in drawing up staff report — Inconsistency of general and specific assessments)
Case F-32/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — DO v ESMA (Civil service — ESMA staff — Member of the temporary staff — Non-renewal of contract — Staff report — Delay in drawing up staff report — Inconsistency of general and specific assessments)
IO C 171, 26.5.2015, p. 36–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.5.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 171/36 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 March 2015 — DO v ESMA
(Case F-32/14) (1)
((Civil service - ESMA staff - Member of the temporary staff - Non-renewal of contract - Staff report - Delay in drawing up staff report - Inconsistency of general and specific assessments))
(2015/C 171/43)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: DO (represented by: S.A. Pappas, lawyer)
Defendant: European Securities and Markets Authority (represented by: R. Vasileva, acting as Agent, assisted by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision not to renew the applicant’s temporary agent contract as a consequence of the negative appraisal report, for annulment of the above-mentioned appraisal report and for compensation for the loss suffered.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Declares that DO is to bear her own costs and orders her to pay the costs incurred by the European Securities and Markets Authority. |
(1) OJ C 184, 16.6.2014, p. 45.