EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TN0559
Case T-559/13: Action brought on 25 October 2013 — Giovanni Cosmetics v OHIM — Vasconcelos & Gonçalves (GIOVANNI GALLI)
Case T-559/13: Action brought on 25 October 2013 — Giovanni Cosmetics v OHIM — Vasconcelos & Gonçalves (GIOVANNI GALLI)
Case T-559/13: Action brought on 25 October 2013 — Giovanni Cosmetics v OHIM — Vasconcelos & Gonçalves (GIOVANNI GALLI)
IO C 24, 25.1.2014, p. 23–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
25.1.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 24/23 |
Action brought on 25 October 2013 — Giovanni Cosmetics v OHIM — Vasconcelos & Gonçalves (GIOVANNI GALLI)
(Case T-559/13)
2014/C 24/41
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Giovanni Cosmetics, Inc. (Rancho Dominguez, United States) (represented by: J. van den Berg and M. Meddens-Bakker, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vasconcelos & Gonçalves, SA (Lisbon, Portugal)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 August 2013 given in Case R 1189/2012-2; |
— |
Order that the CTM application No 9 232 471 be refused; |
— |
Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘GIOVANNI GALLI’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 14 and 18 — Community trade mark application No 9 232 471
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 2 404 283 of the word mark ‘GIOVANNI’ for goods in Class 3
Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b)CTMR.