This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TB0037
Case T-37/13: Order of the General Court of 12 July 2013 — Exakt Advanced Technologies v OHIM — Exakt Precision Tools (EXAKT) (Community trade mark — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Withdrawal of the application — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-37/13: Order of the General Court of 12 July 2013 — Exakt Advanced Technologies v OHIM — Exakt Precision Tools (EXAKT) (Community trade mark — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Withdrawal of the application — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-37/13: Order of the General Court of 12 July 2013 — Exakt Advanced Technologies v OHIM — Exakt Precision Tools (EXAKT) (Community trade mark — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Withdrawal of the application — No need to adjudicate)
IO C 298, 12.10.2013, p. 6–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
IO C 298, 12.10.2013, p. 5–5
(HR)
12.10.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 298/6 |
Order of the General Court of 12 July 2013 — Exakt Advanced Technologies v OHIM — Exakt Precision Tools (EXAKT)
(Case T-37/13) (1)
(Community trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of the application - No need to adjudicate)
2013/C 298/09
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Exakt Advanced Technologies GmbH (Norderstedt, Germany) (represented by: A. von Bismarck, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Exakt Precision Tools Ltd (Aberdeen, United Kingdom)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 October 2012 (Case R 1764/2011-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Exakt Advanced Technologies GmbH and Exakt Precision Tools Ltd.
Operative part of the order
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
2. |
The applicant is ordered to pay its own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant. |