This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013CN0201
Case C-201/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 17 April 2013 — Johan Deckmyn, Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Others
Case C-201/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 17 April 2013 — Johan Deckmyn, Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Others
Case C-201/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 17 April 2013 — Johan Deckmyn, Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Others
IO C 189, 29.6.2013, p. 6–6
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
29.6.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 189/6 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van beroep te Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 17 April 2013 — Johan Deckmyn, Vrijheidsfonds VZW v Helena Vandersteen and Others
(Case C-201/13)
2013/C 189/11
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Hof van beroep te Brussel
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: Johan Deckmyn, Vrijheidsfonds VZW
Defendants: Helena Vandersteen, Christiane Vandersteen, Liliana Vandersteen, Isabelle Vandersteen, Rita Dupont, Amoras II CVOH, WPG Uitgevers België
Questions referred
1. |
Is the concept of ‘parody’ an independent concept in European Union law? |
2. |
If so, must a parody satisfy the following conditions or conform to the following characteristics:
|
3. |
Must a work satisfy any other conditions or conform to other characteristics in order to be capable of being labelled as a parody? |