This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009FA0068
Case F-68/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 February 2011 — Barbin v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — 2006 promotion exercise — Enforcement of a judgment of the Tribunal — Comparative examination of the merits — Principle of equal treatment — Half-time parental leave)
Case F-68/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 February 2011 — Barbin v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — 2006 promotion exercise — Enforcement of a judgment of the Tribunal — Comparative examination of the merits — Principle of equal treatment — Half-time parental leave)
Case F-68/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 February 2011 — Barbin v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — 2006 promotion exercise — Enforcement of a judgment of the Tribunal — Comparative examination of the merits — Principle of equal treatment — Half-time parental leave)
IO C 252, 27.8.2011, p. 50–50
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
27.8.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 252/50 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 15 February 2011 — Barbin v Parliament
(Case F-68/09) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - 2006 promotion exercise - Enforcement of a judgment of the Tribunal - Comparative examination of the merits - Principle of equal treatment - Half-time parental leave)
2011/C 252/107
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Florence Barbin (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, C. Burgos, J.F. de Wachter, R. Ignătescu and K. Zejdová, Agents)
Re:
Annulment of the European Parliament’s decision not to promote the applicant to Grade AD 12 for the 2006 promotion exercise
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Ms Barbin to pay all the costs. |
(1) OJ C 220 of 12.09.09, p. 43.