This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62007TN0418
Case T-418/07: Action brought on 19 November 2007 — LIBRO v OHIM — Causley (LiBRO)
Case T-418/07: Action brought on 19 November 2007 — LIBRO v OHIM — Causley (LiBRO)
Case T-418/07: Action brought on 19 November 2007 — LIBRO v OHIM — Causley (LiBRO)
IO C 8, 12.1.2008, p. 27–27
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
12.1.2008 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 8/27 |
Action brought on 19 November 2007 — LIBRO v OHIM — Causley (LiBRO)
(Case T-418/07)
(2008/C 8/48)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: LIBRO Handelsgesellschaft mbH (Guntramsdorf, Austria) (represented by: G. Prantl, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Dagmar Causley (Pleidesheim, Germany)
Form of order sought
— |
Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market of 3 September 2007 (Case 1454/2005-4) and alter it so as to allow the applicant's appeal lodged with the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market and as a consequence to reject the objection in its entirety; |
— |
Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market and any interveners jointly to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: LIBRO Handelsgesellschaft mbH
Community trade mark concerned: the word and figurative mark ‘LiBRO’ for goods and services in classes 2, 9, 14, 16, 18, 20, 25, 28, 35, 38, 41 and 42 (Application No 2 616 753).
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Dagmar Causley.
Mark or sign cited in opposition: The figurative mark ‘LIBERO’ for goods and services in classes 9, 38 and 42 (Community trade mark No 401 141).
Decision of the Opposition Division: partial rejection of the application.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: partial annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division.
Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) as there is no likelihood of confusion of the opposing trade marks.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ 1994 L 11, p. 1).