Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62006TA0048

    Case T-48/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 September 2008 — Astex Therapeutics v OHIM — Protec Health International (astex TECHNOLOGY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark astex TECHNOLOGY — Earlier Community word mark ASTEX — Ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94)

    IO C 272, 25.10.2008, p. 19–19 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.10.2008   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 272/19


    Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 10 September 2008 — Astex Therapeutics v OHIM — Protec Health International (astex TECHNOLOGY)

    (Case T-48/06) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark astex TECHNOLOGY - Earlier Community word mark ASTEX - Ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94)

    (2008/C 272/34)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Astex Therapeutics Ltd (Cambridge, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Edenborough, barrister, and R. Harrison, solicitor)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Protec Health International Ltd (Cirencester, United Kingdom)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 November 2005 (Case R 651/2004-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Protec Health International Ltd and Astex Therapeutics Ltd.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action.

    2.

    Orders Astex Therapeutics Ltd to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 86, 8.4.2006.


    Top