Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62016TN0328

    Case T-328/16: Action brought on 23 June 2016 — Paice v EUIPO — Blackmore (DEEP PURPLE)

    IO C 305, 22.8.2016, p. 44–45 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    23/06/2016
    Date lodged:
    23/06/2016
    Author:
    Cúirt Ghinearálta
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Béarla
    Type of procedure:
    Caingean le haghaidh neamhniú
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    22.8.2016   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 305/44

    Action brought on 23 June 2016 — Paice v EUIPO — Blackmore (DEEP PURPLE)

    (Case T-328/16)

    (2016/C 305/60)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Ian Paice (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Engelman, Barrister and J. Stephenson, Solicitor)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Richard Hugh Blackmore (New York, New York, United States)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘DEEP PURPLE’ — Application for registration No 11 772 721

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2016 in Case R 736/2015-5

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision in any way it sees fit, namely that the trade mark be rejected in its entirety for all of the goods and services for which it was filed;

    —

    order EUIPO to pay the applicant’s costs of this appeal.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009.
    Top