Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TN0359

    Case T-359/13: Action brought on 11 July 2013 — Spain Doce 13 v OHIM — Ovejero Jiménez and Becerra Guibert (VICTORIA DELEF)

    IO C 252, 31.8.2013, p. 41–41 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    IO C 252, 31.8.2013, p. 27–27 (HR)

    31.8.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 252/41


    Action brought on 11 July 2013 — Spain Doce 13 v OHIM — Ovejero Jiménez and Becerra Guibert (VICTORIA DELEF)

    (Case T-359/13)

    2013/C 252/69

    Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Spain Doce 13, SL (Crevillente, Spain) (represented by: S. Rizzo, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Gregorio Ovejero Jiménez and María Luisa Becerra Guibert (Alicante, Spain)

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the General Court should:

    annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 April 2013 in Case R 1046/2012-5 in so far as it refuses registration of Community trade mark application No 9 522 384 in relation to the following goods and services:

    Class 18: goods made of leather and imitations of leather not included in other classes;

    Class 25: clothing, footwear and headgear;

    Class 35: retail and wholesale services of clothing, footwear and accessories;

    order OHIM to pay the costs in accordance with Article 87(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for a Community trade mark: Spain Doce 13, SL

    Community trade mark concerned: Word mark ‘VICTORIA DELEF’ for goods and services in Classes 18, 25 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 9 522 384

    Proprietors of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Gregorio Ovejero Jiménez and María Luisa Becerra Guibert

    Mark or sign cited in opposition: National figurative marks containing the word element ‘VICTORIA’, ‘Victoria’ and ‘victoria’ for goods in Class 25

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal upheld in part

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009


    Top