Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008TN0477

    Case T-477/08: Action brought on 3 November 2008 — Mundipharma v OHIM — ALK-Abelló (AVANZALENE)

    IO C 6, 10.1.2009, p. 39–39 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    Date of document:
    03/11/2008
    Date lodged:
    03/11/2008
    Author:
    Cúirt Chéadchéime
    Form:
    Faisnéis bhreithiúnach
    Authentic language:
    Béarla
    Link
    Select all documents mentioning this document
    Instruments cited in case law:
    Link

    10.1.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 6/39

    Action brought on 3 November 2008 — Mundipharma v OHIM — ALK-Abelló (AVANZALENE)

    (Case T-477/08)

    (2009/C 6/77)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Mundipharma AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: F. Nielsen, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ALK-Abelló A/S (Hørsholm, Denmark)

    Form of order sought

    —

    Revoke the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 28 August 2008 in case R 1694/2007-4; and

    —

    Order OHIM to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

    Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘AVANZALENE’ for goods in class 5 — application No 4 632 501

    Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Mark or sign cited: Community trade mark registration No 3 331 444 of the word mark ‘AVANZ’ for goods in class 5

    Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 40/94 as the Board of Appeal erred in its finding that there is a likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned.

    Top