Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012CA0350

Case C-350/12 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2014  — Council of the European Union v Sophie in ’t Veld (Appeal — Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Third indent of Article 4(1)(a), second indent of Article 4(2), and Article 4(6) — Opinion of the Council’s Legal Service concerning the opening of negotiations for the conclusion of an international agreement — Exceptions to the right of access — Protection of the public interest as regards international relations — Protection of legal advice — Decision partially refusing access)

OJ C 292, 1.9.2014, pp. 3–3 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

1.9.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 292/3


Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2014 — Council of the European Union v Sophie in ’t Veld

(Case C-350/12 P) (1)

((Appeal - Access to documents of the institutions - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Third indent of Article 4(1)(a), second indent of Article 4(2), and Article 4(6) - Opinion of the Council’s Legal Service concerning the opening of negotiations for the conclusion of an international agreement - Exceptions to the right of access - Protection of the public interest as regards international relations - Protection of legal advice - Decision partially refusing access))

2014/C 292/03

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: P. Berman, B. Driessen and C. Fekete, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Sophie in ’t Veld (represented by: O. Brouwer, E. Raedts and J. Blockx, advocaten), European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders and P. Costa de Oliveira, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of Sophie in ’t Veld: European Parliament (represented by: N. Lorenz and N. Görlitz, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1)

Dismisses the appeal;

2)

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay the costs;

3)

Orders the European Parliament and the European Commission to bear their own costs.


(1)  OJ C 303, 6.10.2012.


Top