EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2004/314/38
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 October 2004 in Case T-137/02: Pollmeier Malchow GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (State aid — Action for annulment — Recommendation 96/280/EC — Meaning of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs))
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 October 2004 in Case T-137/02: Pollmeier Malchow GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (State aid — Action for annulment — Recommendation 96/280/EC — Meaning of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs))
Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 October 2004 in Case T-137/02: Pollmeier Malchow GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (State aid — Action for annulment — Recommendation 96/280/EC — Meaning of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs))
Information about publishing Official Journal not found, p. 15–15
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
18.12.2004 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 314/15 |
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
of 14 October 2004
in Case T-137/02: Pollmeier Malchow GmbH & Co. KG v Commission of the European Communities (1)
(State aid - Action for annulment - Recommendation 96/280/EC - Meaning of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs))
(2004/C 314/38)
Language of the case: German
In Case T-137/02: Pollmeier Malchow GmbH & Co. KG, established in Malchow (Germany), represented by S. Völcker and J. Heithecker, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Kreuschitz and V. Di Bucci, and M. Núñez-Müller) — action for annulment of Commission Decision 2002/821/EC of 15 January 2002 on the State aid implemented by Germany for Pollmeier GmbH, Malchow (OJ 2002 L 296, p. 20) — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili, A.W.H. Meij, M. Vilaras and N.J. Forwood, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 October 2004, in which it:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders the applicant to pay the costs. |