Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN0245

    Case T-245/23: Action brought on 12 May 2023 — Braunschweiger Versorgungs v EUIPO — B.F. Energy (BF energy)

    OJ C 235, 3.7.2023, p. 61–61 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    3.7.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 235/61

    Action brought on 12 May 2023 — Braunschweiger Versorgungs v EUIPO — B.F. Energy (BF energy)

    (Case T-245/23)

    (2023/C 235/74)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Braunschweiger Versorgungs AG & Co. KG (Braunschweig, Germany) (represented by: C. Drzymalla, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: B.F. Energy Srl (Rome, Italy)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union trade mark BF energy — Application for registration No 18 336 443

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 February 2023 in Case R 1646/2022-2

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the contested decision;

    —

    reject the application for the trade mark at issue;

    —

    order EUIPO and the other party to pay the costs, including the costs of proceedings before the Board of Appeal.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the level of attention of the public at large;

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the visual, aural and conceptual similarity of the signs;

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to the overall assessment of the likelihood of confusion.
    Top