This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0185
Case T-185/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik v EUIPO — Schuju (Хозяйка) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Хозяйка — Earlier national figurative mark хозяюшка — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-185/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik v EUIPO — Schuju (Хозяйка) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Хозяйка — Earlier national figurative mark хозяюшка — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-185/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik v EUIPO — Schuju (Хозяйка) (EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark Хозяйка — Earlier national figurative mark хозяюшка — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
OJ C 171, 25.4.2022, p. 33–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 171, 25.4.2022, p. 27–27
(GA)
|
25.4.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 171/33 |
Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2022 — Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik v EUIPO — Schuju (Хозяйка)
(Case T-185/21) (1)
(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark Хозяйка - Earlier national figurative mark хозяюшка - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2022/C 171/43)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH (Bühl, Germany) (represented by: A. Lingenfelser, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Eberl and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Peter Schuju (Borchen, Germany) (represented by: K. Borstel, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2020 (Case R 2717/2019-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mr Schuju and Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Lackmann Fleisch- und Feinkostfabrik GmbH to pay the costs. |