This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0149
Case T-149/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — Vitae Health Innovation (VITADHA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark VITADHA — Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-149/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — Vitae Health Innovation (VITADHA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark VITADHA — Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-149/21: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — Vitae Health Innovation (VITADHA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Word mark VITADHA — Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
OJ C 171, 25.4.2022, p. 31–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 171, 25.4.2022, p. 26–26
(GA)
|
25.4.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 171/31 |
Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2022 — UGA Nutraceuticals v EUIPO — Vitae Health Innovation (VITADHA)
(Case T-149/21) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark VITADHA - Earlier Spanish word mark VITANADH - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2022/C 171/40)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: UGA Nutraceuticals Srl (Gubbio, Italy) (represented by: M. Riva, J. Graffer and A. Ottolini, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Vitae Health Innovation, SL (Montmeló, Spain) (represented by: E. Torner Lasalle, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 January 2021 (Case R 2719/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Vitae Health Innovation and UGA Nutraceuticals.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders UGA Nutraceuticals Srl to pay the costs. |