This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CN0673
Case C-673/21 P: Appeal brought on 9 November 2021 by KN against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 1 September 2021 in Case T-377/20, KN v EESC
Case C-673/21 P: Appeal brought on 9 November 2021 by KN against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 1 September 2021 in Case T-377/20, KN v EESC
Case C-673/21 P: Appeal brought on 9 November 2021 by KN against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 1 September 2021 in Case T-377/20, KN v EESC
OJ C 11, 10.1.2022, p. 20–21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.1.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 11/20 |
Appeal brought on 9 November 2021 by KN against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 1 September 2021 in Case T-377/20, KN v EESC
(Case C-673/21 P)
(2022/C 11/27)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: KN (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld and M. Aboudi, avocats)
Other party to the proceedings: European Economic and Social Committee
Form of order sought
The appellant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
set aside the judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021, KN v EESC (T-377/20); |
|
— |
grant the forms of order sought at first instance; |
|
— |
order the EESC to pay all the costs, including those incurred before the General Court. |
Grounds of appeal and main arguments
In the context of the appeal, the appellant contests in particular paragraphs 102 to 106, 167 to 169, 171 to 177 and 197 of the judgment under appeal.
In support of the appeal, the appellant puts forward a single ground of appeal, alleging a distortion of the facts by the judgment under appeal and manifest errors of assessment resulting in inaccurate legal reasoning.