This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0019
Case T-19/20: Action brought on 13 January 2020 — sprd.net v EUIPO — Shirtlabor (I love)
Case T-19/20: Action brought on 13 January 2020 — sprd.net v EUIPO — Shirtlabor (I love)
Case T-19/20: Action brought on 13 January 2020 — sprd.net v EUIPO — Shirtlabor (I love)
OJ C 68, 2.3.2020, p. 62–63
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
2.3.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 68/62 |
Action brought on 13 January 2020 — sprd.net v EUIPO — Shirtlabor (I love)
(Case T-19/20)
(2020/C 68/70)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: sprd.net AG (Leipzig, Germany) (represented by: J. Hellenbrand, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Shirtlabor GmbH (Münster, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘I love’ in black and red — European Union trade mark No 10 023 067
Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation procedure
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 October 2019 in Case R 5/2019-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 16(1)(a) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 97(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council; |
|
— |
Infringement of the principle of non-arbitrariness. |