This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020CA0172
Case C-172/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022 — WV v European External Action Service (EEAS) (Appeal — Civil service — Request for assistance — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 90(1) and (2) — Date on which the request was made — Implied decision refusing the request — Complaint — Submission — Time period — Excusable error)
Case C-172/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022 — WV v European External Action Service (EEAS) (Appeal — Civil service — Request for assistance — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 90(1) and (2) — Date on which the request was made — Implied decision refusing the request — Complaint — Submission — Time period — Excusable error)
Case C-172/20 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022 — WV v European External Action Service (EEAS) (Appeal — Civil service — Request for assistance — Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union — Article 90(1) and (2) — Date on which the request was made — Implied decision refusing the request — Complaint — Submission — Time period — Excusable error)
OJ C 171, 25.4.2022, p. 5–5
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 171, 25.4.2022, p. 4–4
(GA)
|
25.4.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 171/5 |
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 3 March 2022 — WV v European External Action Service (EEAS)
(Case C-172/20 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil service - Request for assistance - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 90(1) and (2) - Date on which the request was made - Implied decision refusing the request - Complaint - Submission - Time period - Excusable error)
(2022/C 171/06)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: WV (represented by: É. Boigelot, avocat)
Other party to the proceedings: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spáč, acting as Agents, and by M. Troncoso Ferrer, abogado, and F.-M. Hislaire, avocat)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the appeal; |
|
2. |
Orders WV to pay the costs. |