This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CA0081
Case C-81/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Romania) — NG, OH v SC Banca Transilvania SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Scope — Article 1(2) — Definition of ‘mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions’ — Supplementary provisions — Loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency — Term relating to the foreign exchange risk)
Case C-81/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Romania) — NG, OH v SC Banca Transilvania SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Scope — Article 1(2) — Definition of ‘mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions’ — Supplementary provisions — Loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency — Term relating to the foreign exchange risk)
Case C-81/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Romania) — NG, OH v SC Banca Transilvania SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Scope — Article 1(2) — Definition of ‘mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions’ — Supplementary provisions — Loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency — Term relating to the foreign exchange risk)
OJ C 287, 31.8.2020, p. 7–7
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
31.8.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 287/7 |
Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 9 July 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Romania) — NG, OH v SC Banca Transilvania SA
(Case C-81/19) (1)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Scope - Article 1(2) - Definition of ‘mandatory statutory or regulatory provisions’ - Supplementary provisions - Loan agreement denominated in a foreign currency - Term relating to the foreign exchange risk)
(2020/C 287/09)
Language of the case: Romanian
Referring court
Curtea de Apel Cluj
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicants: NG, OH
Defendant: SC Banca Transilvania SA
Operative part of the judgment
Article 1(2) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that a contractual term which has not been individually negotiated but which reflects a rule that, under national law, applies between contracting parties provided that no other arrangements have been established in that respect falls outside the scope of that directive.