This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TN0432
Case T-432/18: Action brought on 13 July 2018 — Palo v Commission
Case T-432/18: Action brought on 13 July 2018 — Palo v Commission
Case T-432/18: Action brought on 13 July 2018 — Palo v Commission
OJ C 319, 10.9.2018, p. 23–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
10.9.2018 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 319/23 |
Action brought on 13 July 2018 — Palo v Commission
(Case T-432/18)
(2018/C 319/27)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Peeter Palo (Tallinn, Estonia) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
|
— |
annul the defendant’s decision of 5 October 2017 not to allocate the applicant the severance grant provided for under Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations; |
|
— |
annul the defendant’s decision of 10 April 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 11 December 2017 directed against the abovementioned decision; |
|
— |
order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the material damage suffered by the applicant; |
|
— |
order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant; |
|
— |
order the defendant to bear all the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations. |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of legitimate expectations. |
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of good administration and of the duty of care. |