This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TA0631
Case T-631/16: Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Remag Metallhandel and Jaschinsky v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Anti-dumping — OLAF’s insistence that Member States recover anti-dumping duties relating to any importation of silicon metal originating in Taiwan without proof that that silicon metal originated in China — Regulation (EC) No 398/2004 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2010 — Causal link)
Case T-631/16: Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Remag Metallhandel and Jaschinsky v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Anti-dumping — OLAF’s insistence that Member States recover anti-dumping duties relating to any importation of silicon metal originating in Taiwan without proof that that silicon metal originated in China — Regulation (EC) No 398/2004 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2010 — Causal link)
Case T-631/16: Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Remag Metallhandel and Jaschinsky v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Anti-dumping — OLAF’s insistence that Member States recover anti-dumping duties relating to any importation of silicon metal originating in Taiwan without proof that that silicon metal originated in China — Regulation (EC) No 398/2004 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2010 — Causal link)
OJ C 238, 15.7.2019, p. 15–15
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
15.7.2019 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 238/15 |
Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Remag Metallhandel and Jaschinsky v Commission
(Case T-631/16) (1)
(Non-contractual liability - Anti-dumping - OLAF’s insistence that Member States recover anti-dumping duties relating to any importation of silicon metal originating in Taiwan without proof that that silicon metal originated in China - Regulation (EC) No 398/2004 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 467/2010 - Causal link)
(2019/C 238/18)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Remag Metallhandel GmbH (Steyr, Austria) and Werner Jaschinsky (St. Ulrich bei Steyr, Austria) (represented by: M. Lux, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros and A. Lewis, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 268 TFEU, seeking compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the request by the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) that the customs authorities of the Member States recover anti-dumping duties for consignments of silicon exported from Taiwan to the European Union.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Remag Metallhandel GmbH and Mr Werner Jaschinsky to pay the costs. |