EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0539
Case T-539/15: Action brought on 17 September 2015 — LLR-G5 v OHIM — Glycan Finance (SILICIUM ORGANIQUE G5 LLR-G5)
Case T-539/15: Action brought on 17 September 2015 — LLR-G5 v OHIM — Glycan Finance (SILICIUM ORGANIQUE G5 LLR-G5)
Case T-539/15: Action brought on 17 September 2015 — LLR-G5 v OHIM — Glycan Finance (SILICIUM ORGANIQUE G5 LLR-G5)
OJ C 381, 16.11.2015, p. 50–51
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
16.11.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 381/50 |
Action brought on 17 September 2015 — LLR-G5 v OHIM — Glycan Finance (SILICIUM ORGANIQUE G5 LLR-G5)
(Case T-539/15)
(2015/C 381/61)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: LLR-G5 Ltd (Castlebar, Ireland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Glycan Finance Corp. Ltd (Sheffield, United Kingdom)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark in colour containing the word elements ‘SILICIUM ORGANIQUE G5 LLR-G5’ — Community trade mark application No 10 424 703
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2015 in Case R 291/2014-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the contested decision to the extent that it dismissed the applicant’s appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division of 27 November 2013 in case B 2 027 053, and to the extent that it granted the other party’s appeal against the same decision of the Opposition Division; |
— |
the opposition of the other party to the registration of the applicant’s community trade mark application No. 1 042 4703 is dismissed; |
— |
order OHIM and the other party, if it should intervene in these proceedings, to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |