This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0509
Case T-509/15: Action brought on 3 September 2015 — Kessel medintim v OHIM — Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Premeno)
Case T-509/15: Action brought on 3 September 2015 — Kessel medintim v OHIM — Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Premeno)
Case T-509/15: Action brought on 3 September 2015 — Kessel medintim v OHIM — Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Premeno)
OJ C 354, 26.10.2015, p. 45–46
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.10.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 354/45 |
Action brought on 3 September 2015 — Kessel medintim v OHIM — Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Premeno)
(Case T-509/15)
(2015/C 354/55)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Kessel medintim GmbH (Mörfelden-Walldorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Jacob and U. Staudenmaier, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Neuss, Germany)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Premeno’ — Application No 6 408 926
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 July 2015 in Case R 349/2015-4
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision and dismiss the opposition; |
|
— |
in the alternative: refer the opposition back to OHIM for a new decision; |
|
— |
order OHIM to pay the cost of the proceedings in accordance with Article 134(1) TFEU. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 75(2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |