EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62015TN0125
Case T-125/15: Action brought on 18 March 2015 — Unicorn v OHIM — Mercilink Equipment Leasing (UNICORN)
Case T-125/15: Action brought on 18 March 2015 — Unicorn v OHIM — Mercilink Equipment Leasing (UNICORN)
Case T-125/15: Action brought on 18 March 2015 — Unicorn v OHIM — Mercilink Equipment Leasing (UNICORN)
OJ C 171, 26.5.2015, p. 31–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
26.5.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 171/31 |
Action brought on 18 March 2015 — Unicorn v OHIM — Mercilink Equipment Leasing (UNICORN)
(Case T-125/15)
(2015/C 171/36)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Unicorn a.s. (Praha, Czech Republic) (represented by: L. Lorenc, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mercilink Equipment Leasing Ltd (Limassol, Cyprus)
Details of the proceedings before OHIM
Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘UNICORN’ — Community trade mark No 11 014 701
Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 January 2015 in Case R 150/2014-5
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
Annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law
|
— |
OHIM did not properly take into consideration evidence submitted by the applicant; |
|
— |
OHIM incorrectly considered good reputation of the earlier trademarks. |