Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014TA0256

    Case T-256/14: Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2015 –Giuntoli v OHIM — Société des produits Nestlé SA (CREMERIA TOSCANA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark CREMERIA TOSCANA — Earlier international figurative mark la Cremeria — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    OJ C 429, 21.12.2015, p. 20–21 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.12.2015   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 429/20


    Judgment of the General Court of 29 October 2015 –Giuntoli v OHIM — Société des produits Nestlé SA (CREMERIA TOSCANA)

    (Case T-256/14) (1)

    ((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark CREMERIA TOSCANA - Earlier international figurative mark la Cremeria - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

    (2015/C 429/26)

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Andrea Giuntoli (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz and T. Bösling, lawyers)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 February 2014 (Case R 886/2013-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Société des produits Nestlé SA and Andrea Giuntoli.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Mr Giuntoli to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 253, 4.8.2014.


    Top