EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TN0333
Case T-333/13: Action brought on 17 June 2013 — Westermann Lernspielverlag/OHIM — Diset (bambinoLÜK)
Case T-333/13: Action brought on 17 June 2013 — Westermann Lernspielverlag/OHIM — Diset (bambinoLÜK)
Case T-333/13: Action brought on 17 June 2013 — Westermann Lernspielverlag/OHIM — Diset (bambinoLÜK)
OJ C 252, 31.8.2013, p. 36–36
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 252, 31.8.2013, p. 23–23
(HR)
31.8.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 252/36 |
Action brought on 17 June 2013 — Westermann Lernspielverlag/OHIM — Diset (bambinoLÜK)
(Case T-333/13)
2013/C 252/60
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: Westermann Lernspielverlag GmbH (Braunschweig, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Diset, SA (Barcelona, Spain)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) [OHIM] of 3 April 2013, Case R 1323/2012-2, relating to the opposition proceedings No. B 1 724 593 [Community trade mark application 009080359] between DISET, S.A. and Westermann Lernspielverlag GmbH; |
— |
Order the Defendant to bear the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘bambinoLÜK’, for goods in classes 9, 16 and 28 — Community trade mark application No 9 080 359
Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark of the figurative mark ‘BAMBINO’ for goods in classes 16, 28 and 41
Decision of the Opposition Division: Partly upheld the opposition
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partly upheld the appeal and allows the CTM application to proceed for certain goods of class 9
Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) Council Regulation No 207/2009.