Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62013TA0544(01)

Case T-544/13 RENV: Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2018 — Dyson v Commission (Directive 2010/30/EU – Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products – Commission delegated regulation supplementing the directive – Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners – Essential element of an enabling act)

OJ C 4, 7.1.2019, p. 20–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

7.1.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/20


Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2018 — Dyson v Commission

(Case T-544/13 RENV) (1)

(Directive 2010/30/EU - Indication by labelling and standard product information of the consumption of energy and other resources by energy-related products - Commission delegated regulation supplementing the directive - Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners - Essential element of an enabling act)

(2019/C 4/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dyson Ltd (Malmesbury, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Carlin, Barrister, E. Batchelor and M. Healy, Solicitors, and A. Patsa, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, K. Herrmann and K. Talabér-Ritz, Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 of 3 May 2013 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of vacuum cleaners (OJ 2013 L 192, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Annuls Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 of 3 May 2013 supplementing Directive 2010/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to energy labelling of vacuum cleaners;

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings on appeal before the Court of Justice.


(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.


Top