Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011TA0569

    Case T-569/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Gitana SA v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark GITANA — Earlier Community figurative mark KiTANA — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Identity or similarity of the goods — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Partial refusal of registration)

    OJ C 336, 16.11.2013, p. 20–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
    OJ C 336, 16.11.2013, p. 19–19 (HR)

    16.11.2013   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 336/20


    Judgment of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Gitana SA v OHIM — Teddy (GITANA)

    (Case T-569/11) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark GITANA - Earlier Community figurative mark KiTANA - Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Identity or similarity of the goods - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Partial refusal of registration)

    2013/C 336/40

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Gitana SA (Pregny-Chambésy, Switzerland) (represented by: F. Benech, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Teddy SpA (Rimini, Italy) (represented by: S. Rizzo, lawyer)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 August 2011 (Case R 1825/2007-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Rosenruist — Gestão e serviços, Lda and Gitana SA

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Gitana SA to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 6, 7.1.2012.


    Top