This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TA0483
Case T-483/11: Judgment of the General Court of (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2013 — Sepro Europe v Commission (Plant-protection products — Active substance flurprimidol — Non-inclusion of flurprimidol in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC — Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 — Accelerated assessment procedure — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of the defence — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-483/11: Judgment of the General Court of (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2013 — Sepro Europe v Commission (Plant-protection products — Active substance flurprimidol — Non-inclusion of flurprimidol in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC — Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 — Accelerated assessment procedure — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of the defence — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-483/11: Judgment of the General Court of (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2013 — Sepro Europe v Commission (Plant-protection products — Active substance flurprimidol — Non-inclusion of flurprimidol in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC — Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 — Accelerated assessment procedure — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of the defence — Proportionality — Obligation to state reasons)
OJ C 304, 19.10.2013, p. 17–17
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
19.10.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 304/17 |
Judgment of the General Court of (Fourth Chamber) of 6 September 2013 — Sepro Europe v Commission
(Case T-483/11) (1)
(Plant-protection products - Active substance flurprimidol - Non-inclusion of flurprimidol in Annex I to Directive 91/414/EEC - Regulation (EC) No 33/2008 - Accelerated assessment procedure - Manifest error of assessment - Rights of the defence - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons)
2013/C 304/28
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Sepro Europe Ltd (Harrogate, United Kingdom) (represented by: C. Mereu and K. Van Maldegem, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Ondrůšek and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision 2011/328/EU of 1 June 2011 concerning the non-inclusion of flurprimidol in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC (OJ 2011 L 153, p. 192)
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Sepro Europe Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |