This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TA0101
Case T-101/11: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2012 — Mizuno v OHIM — Golfino (G) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark G — Earlier Community figurative mark G+ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-101/11: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2012 — Mizuno v OHIM — Golfino (G) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark G — Earlier Community figurative mark G+ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-101/11: Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2012 — Mizuno v OHIM — Golfino (G) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark G — Earlier Community figurative mark G+ — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 184, 23.6.2012, p. 12–12
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
23.6.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 184/12 |
Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2012 — Mizuno v OHIM — Golfino (G)
(Case T-101/11) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark G - Earlier Community figurative mark G+ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2012/C 184/20
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Mizuno KK (Osaka, Japan) (represented by: T. Raab and H.R. Lauf, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by R. Manea and subsequently by D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Golfino AG (Glinde, Germany)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 December 2010 (Case R 821/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Golfino AG and Mizuno KK
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Mizuno KK to pay the costs. |