EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TB0034
Case T-34/10: Order of the General Court of 13 December 2012 — Hairdreams v OHIM — Bartmann (MAGIC LIGHT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark MAGIC LIGHT — Earlier national word mark MAGIC LIFE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-34/10: Order of the General Court of 13 December 2012 — Hairdreams v OHIM — Bartmann (MAGIC LIGHT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark MAGIC LIGHT — Earlier national word mark MAGIC LIFE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-34/10: Order of the General Court of 13 December 2012 — Hairdreams v OHIM — Bartmann (MAGIC LIGHT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark MAGIC LIGHT — Earlier national word mark MAGIC LIFE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 38, 9.2.2013, p. 18–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
9.2.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 38/18 |
Order of the General Court of 13 December 2012 — Hairdreams v OHIM — Bartmann (MAGIC LIGHT)
(Case T-34/10) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark MAGIC LIGHT - Earlier national word mark MAGIC LIFE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2013/C 38/29
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Hairdreams HaarhandelsgmbH (Graz, Austria) (represented by: G. Kresbach, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Rüdiger Bartmann (Gladbeck, Germany)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 November 2009 (Case R 656/2008-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Rüdiger Bartmann and Hairdreams HaarhandelsgmbH.
Operative part of the order
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Hairdreams HaarhandelsgmbH to pay the costs. |