EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52013IP0293
European Parliament resolution of 2 July 2013 on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Statute for a European Foundation (FE) (COM(2012)0035 — 2012/0022(APP))
European Parliament resolution of 2 July 2013 on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Statute for a European Foundation (FE) (COM(2012)0035 — 2012/0022(APP))
European Parliament resolution of 2 July 2013 on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Statute for a European Foundation (FE) (COM(2012)0035 — 2012/0022(APP))
OJ C 75, 26.2.2016, p. 11–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
26.2.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 75/11 |
P7_TA(2013)0293
Statute for a European Foundation
European Parliament resolution of 2 July 2013 on the proposal for a Council regulation on the Statute for a European Foundation (FE) (COM(2012)0035 — 2012/0022(APP))
(2016/C 075/03)
The European Parliament,
— |
having regard to the proposal for a Council regulation (COM(2012)0035), |
— |
having regard to the Commission’s impact assessment accompanying its proposal for a Council regulation on the Statute for a European Foundation (FE), |
— |
having regard to the Declaration of the European Parliament of 10 March 2011 on establishing European statutes for mutual societies, associations and foundations (1), |
— |
having regard to the feasibility study on the introduction of a Statute for a European Foundation carried out in 2008 by the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law and the University of Heidelberg, |
— |
having regard to the judgments of the European Court of Justice in Cases C-386/04, Centro di Musicologia Walter Stauffer v Finanzamt München für Körperschaften (2), C-318/07, Hein Persche v Finanzamt Lüdenscheid (3) and C-25/10, Missionswerk Werner Heukelbach eV v Belgian State (4), |
— |
having regard to Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States (European Citizenship) (5), |
— |
having regard to the opinion of the Economic and Social Committee of 18 September 2012 (6), |
— |
having regard to the opinion of the Committee of the Regions of 29 November 2012 (7), |
— |
having regard to Rule 81(3) of its Rules of Procedure, |
— |
having regard to the interim report of the Committee on Legal Affairs and the opinion of the Committee on Culture and Education (A7-0223/2013), |
A. |
whereas there are more than 110 000 foundations with a public benefit purpose in the Union, with estimated combined assets of approximately EUR 350 billion, spending a total of approximately EUR 83 billion and employing between 750 000 and 1 000 000 European citizens; |
B. |
whereas, however, a proportion of the staff of foundations are volunteers who are not paid for their time; |
C. |
whereas the existence and activities of foundations operating in the Union for the public good are crucial in the fields of education, training, research, social and health provision, historical memory and reconciliation between peoples, protection of the environment, youth and sport, as well as arts and culture, and whereas many of their projects have an impact far beyond national borders; |
D. |
whereas, in civil law and tax law throughout the Union, there are more than 50 different pieces of legislation applicable to foundations, as well as a host of complicated administrative procedures, which give rise annually to advisory costs estimated to amount to as much as EUR 100 million — money that thus becomes unavailable for public benefit purposes; |
E. |
whereas legal, tax-related and administrative barriers, which give rise to expensive and lengthy procedures, as well as a lack of appropriate legal instruments, mean that foundations refuse, or find it difficult, to embark on or develop activities in another Member State; |
F. |
whereas, in a time of tight national budgets, particularly for cultural and artistic activities, education and sport, the financial and social commitment of foundations is essential, although they can only complement, and cannot replace, the state in the pursuit of public benefit purposes; |
G. |
whereas, with regard to taxation, it is not tax-law harmonisation that is being proposed, but rather application of the rule of non-discrimination, under which, automatically and as a matter of principle, European foundations and their donors are subject to tax provisions and advantages that are identical to those that apply to national entities with a public benefit purpose; |
H. |
whereas the introduction of a common Statute for a European Foundation could make it much easier for foundations to package and transfer resources, expertise and donations and to pursue their activities throughout the EU; |
I. |
whereas the European Parliament welcomes the Commission’s proposal as a major step towards making it easier for foundations to support public benefit purposes across the EU; |
J. |
whereas the proposed statute is an optional European legal form which will be available for foundations and funders with activities in more than one Member State, but will neither replace nor harmonise existing foundation laws; |
K. |
whereas in times of economic difficulty it is increasingly important that foundations have the right tools to enable them to pursue public benefit purposes at European level and to pool resources, while also reducing costs and legal uncertainties; |
L. |
whereas it is crucial that European Foundations (FEs) operate on a sustainable and long-term basis and are truly active in at least two Member States, as otherwise their specific status would not be justified; |
M. |
whereas some of the terminology and definitions in the Commission proposal require clarification; |
N. |
whereas some additions and adaptations to the Commission proposal appear necessary in order to enhance the trustworthiness and credibility of an FE, for instance as regards compliance with legal and ethical rules, the exclusiveness of the public benefit purpose, the cross-border component, the minimum assets and the need to maintain these in principle throughout the lifetime of the FE, a rule on timely disbursement, the minimum duration, and the payment of remuneration to Members of the governing board or bodies of the FE; |
O. |
whereas creditor protection and employee protection are crucial and need to be maintained throughout the lifetime of an FE; |
P. |
whereas, as regards representation of employees, the reference to Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees (Recast) (8) should be strengthened in order to make clear that the procedural rules under that Directive apply; whereas, furthermore, there should be greater sanctions on infringements, for instance by making the registration of an FE conditional on fulfilment of the requirements under Directive 2009/38/EC, in line with Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1435/2003 of 22 July 2003 on the Statute for a European Cooperative Society (SCE) (9); whereas, beyond this, provisions are necessary regarding the involvement of employees in the bodies of an FE, in line with Council Directive 2001/86/EC of 8 October 2001 supplementing the Statute for a European company with regard to the involvement of employees (10), so that the form of an FE cannot be misused for the purpose of depriving employees of rights to employee involvement or withholding such rights; |
Q. |
whereas a provision regarding the representation of volunteers in the FE is to be welcomed, given that 2,5 million volunteers are active in the sector; |
R. |
whereas the increasing representation and valuable contribution of volunteers in the work of foundations contribute to the objectives of general interest pursued by them; since, especially, more and more young people have to volunteer in order to collect their first work experience, it may be worthwhile for foundations to consider forms and instruments that will allow them to access the information needed to work in a more effective way, for example through the European Workers Council; |
S. |
whereas it is necessary to clarify that the registered seat and the central administration of an FE shall be in the same Member State, in order to prevent the dissociation of the registered seat and central administration or principal place of activities, and also in order to facilitate supervision, given that an FE will be supervised by the supervisory authority of the Member State in which it has its registered office; |
T. |
whereas it should not be the purpose of the FE to finance European political parties; |
U. |
whereas, concerning taxation, the application of the non-discrimination principle as developed by the European Court of Justice needs to be the starting point; whereas it has been acknowledged by the sector that the proposed approach of granting automatic application of equal tax treatment would increase the attractiveness of the FE statute by considerably reducing the fiscal and administrative burden, making it more than a mere civil law instrument; whereas, however, the approach appears to be very contentious in Council, with Member States being reluctant to allow interference with their domestic tax laws; whereas it therefore appears appropriate not to discard possible alternative scenarios; |
V. |
whereas it is important that negotiations on this important piece of legislation move forward quickly in order to provide the foundation sector with this new instrument that it is obviously urgently awaited; |
1. |
Encourages the Member States to use the existing momentum to work for the swift introduction of the Statute on a comprehensive basis, with all guarantees of transparency, so that barriers to foundations’ cross-border work can be dismantled, and new foundations can be set up to meet the needs of the people living in the EU or to work in the public good or further the interests of society; stresses that establishing the Statute would contribute to the implementation of genuine EU citizenship and pave the way for a statute for a European organisation; |
2. |
Emphasises that the FE should contribute to the development of a truly European culture and identity; |
3. |
Points out that, while the legal form of the FE would be new, the proposal is that it should be applied through structures that already exist in the Member States; |
4. |
Welcomes the fact that the Statute lays down minimum standards in terms of transparency, accountability, supervision and use of funds, which can, in turn, serve both citizens and donors as a form of quality label and thereby secure confidence in FEs and prompt the development of their EU activities for the benefit of all citizens; |
5. |
Highlights the potential offered by foundations in providing jobs for young people, among whom unemployment is reaching alarming levels; |
6. |
Calls for the regulation to stipulate that the Member State with financial authority over the foundation shall be responsible for ensuring that it is, in practice, managed strictly in accordance with its statute; |
7. |
Notes that the possibility of merging existing FEs has not yet been established; |
8. |
Notes that, in order to underpin confidence in FEs, the sustainability, seriousness and viability of foundations, as well as the effectiveness of their supervision, must be core criteria and, with this in mind, requests the Council to take into account the following recommendations and modifications:
Modification 1 Proposal for a regulation Recital 15 a (new)
Modification 2 Proposal for a regulation Recital 18
Modification 3 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 — point 1
Modification 4 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 — point 2
Modification 5 Proposal for a regulation Article 2 — point 5
Modification 6 Proposal for a regulation Article 4 — paragraph 2 — point b a (new)
Modification 9 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 — paragraph 2 — subparagraph 2 — introductory wording
Modification 7 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 — paragraph 2 — subparagraph 2 — point s a (new)
Modification 8 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 — paragraph 2 — subparagraph 2 — point s b (new)
Modification 10 Proposal for a regulation Article 5 — paragraph 2 a (new)
Modification 11 Proposal for a regulation Article 6
Modification 12 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 — paragraph 2
Modification 13 Proposal for a regulation Article 7 — paragraph 2 — subparagraph 1 a (new)
Modification 14 Proposal for a regulation Article 12 — paragraph 2
Modification 15 Proposal for a regulation Article 15 — paragraph 2 — point d a (new)
Modification 16 Proposal for a regulation Article 15 — paragraph 3
Modification 17 Proposal for a regulation Article 17 — paragraph 1
Modification 18 Proposal for a regulation Article 18 — paragraph 3
Modification 19 Proposal for a regulation Article 20 — paragraph 1
Modification 20 Proposal for a regulation Article 23 — paragraph 1 — subparagraph 1 — point g
Modification 21 Proposal for a regulation Article 23 — paragraph 2 a (new)
Modification 22 Proposal for a regulation Article 32 — paragraph 1
Modification 23 Proposal for a regulation Article 32 — paragraph 3
Modification 24 Proposal for a regulation Article 34 — paragraph 2
Modification 25 Proposal for a regulation Article 34 — paragraph 4
Modification 26 Proposal for a regulation Article 34 — paragraph 5
Modification 27 Proposal for a regulation Article 35
Modification 28 Proposal for a regulation Article 37 — paragraph 2 — point e a (new)
Modification 29 Proposal for a regulation Article 37 — paragraph 5 — subparagraph 2
Modification 30 Proposal for a regulation Article 38 — paragraph 2 — subparagraphs 1 and 2
Modification 31 Proposal for a regulation Article 38 — paragraph 2 — subparagraph 3
Modification 32 Proposal for a regulation Article 38 — paragraph 3
Modification 33 Proposal for a regulation Article 44 — paragraph 2
Modification 34 Proposal for a regulation Article 45
|
9. |
Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission. |
(1) OJ C 199 E, 7.7.2012, p. 187.
(2) ECR 2006, p. I-8203.
(3) ECR 2009, p. I-359.
(4) ECR 2011, p. I-497.
(5) OJ L 158, 30.4.2004, p. 77.
(6) OJ C 351, 15.11.2012, p. 57.
(7) OJ C 17, 19.1.2013, p. 81.
(8) OJ L 122, 16.5.2009, p. 28.
(9) OJ L 207, 18.8.2003, p. 1.
(10) OJ L 294, 10.11.2001, p. 22.