This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62018TB0388
Case T-388/18: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — WV v EEAS (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Rejection of request — Article 90(1) and (2) of the Staff Regulations — Out of time — Excusable error — Inadmissible)
Case T-388/18: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — WV v EEAS (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Rejection of request — Article 90(1) and (2) of the Staff Regulations — Out of time — Excusable error — Inadmissible)
Case T-388/18: Order of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — WV v EEAS (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Rejection of request — Article 90(1) and (2) of the Staff Regulations — Out of time — Excusable error — Inadmissible)
OJ C 103, 30.3.2020, p. 29–30
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 29/01/2020
- Date lodged:
- 27/06/2018
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- French
- Type of procedure:
- Staff cases - inadmissible
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62018TO0388
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
30.3.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 103/29 |
Order of the General Court of 29 January 2020 — WV v EEAS
(Case T-388/18) (1)
(Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Rejection of request - Article 90(1) and (2) of the Staff Regulations - Out of time - Excusable error - Inadmissible)
(2020/C 103/41)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: WV (represented by: E. Boigelot, lawyer)
Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment, first, of an implied decision of the EEAS, alleged to have been made on 4 September 2017, rejecting the request for assistance lodged by the applicant and, second, the EEAS’ decision of 28 March 2018 dismissing the applicant’s complaint of 29 November 2017 against the implied rejection.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The application is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
WV is ordered to pay the costs. |
