EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62017TA0063

Case T-63/17: Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2018 — Grupo Orenes v EUIPO — Akamon Entertainment Millenium (Bingo VIVA! Slots) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for European Union figurative mark Bingo VIVA! Slots — Earlier European Union figurative mark vive bingo — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Subject matter of the dispute)

OJ C 445, 10.12.2018, p. 16–16 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

10.12.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 445/16


Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2018 — Grupo Orenes v EUIPO — Akamon Entertainment Millenium (Bingo VIVA! Slots)

(Case T-63/17) (1)

((European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for European Union figurative mark Bingo VIVA! Slots - Earlier European Union figurative mark vive bingo - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Subject matter of the dispute))

(2018/C 445/20)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Grupo Orenes (Murcia, Spain) (represented by: M. J. Sanmartín Sanmartín, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Akamon Entertainment Millenium (Barcelona, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 November 2016 (Case R 453/2016-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Grupo Orenes and Akamon Entertainment Millenium.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Grupo Orenes to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 95, 27.3.2017.


Top