This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012TA0349
Case T-349/12: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2013 — Leiner v OHIM — Recaro (REVARO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark REVARO — Earlier international word mark RECARO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-349/12: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2013 — Leiner v OHIM — Recaro (REVARO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark REVARO — Earlier international word mark RECARO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Case T-349/12: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2013 — Leiner v OHIM — Recaro (REVARO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark REVARO — Earlier international word mark RECARO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
OJ C 304, 19.10.2013, p. 19–20
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 06/09/2013
- Date lodged:
- 01/08/2012
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
19.10.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 304/19 |
Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2013 — Leiner v OHIM — Recaro (REVARO)
(Case T-349/12) (1)
(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark REVARO - Earlier international word mark RECARO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
2013/C 304/33
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Rudolf Leiner GmbH (Sankt Pölten, Austria) (represented by: W. Emberger, I. Rudnay and L. Emberger, lawyers)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Recaro Holding GmbH, formerly Recaro Beteiligungs-GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: J. Weiser, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 May 2012 (Case R 482/2011-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Recaro Beteiligungs-GmbH and Rudolf Leiner GmbH.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Rudolf Leiner GmbH to pay the costs. |
