Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62023CN0045

Case C-45/23, MS Amlin Insurance: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 31 January 2023 — A, B, C, D v MS Amlin Insurance SE

OJ C 155, 2.5.2023, p. 31–31 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

2.5.2023   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/31


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel (Belgium) lodged on 31 January 2023 — A, B, C, D v MS Amlin Insurance SE

(Case C-45/23, MS Amlin Insurance)

(2023/C 155/40)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Nederlandstalige Ondernemingsrechtbank Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: A, B, C, D

Respondent: MS Amlin Insurance SE

Question referred

Should Article 17(1) of Directive 2015/2302 (1) of the European Parliament and the Council of 25 November 2015 on package travel and linked travel arrangements, amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 90/314/EEC, be interpreted as meaning that the security which it requires also applies to the refund of all sums already paid by travellers or on their behalf where the traveller terminates the package travel contract by reason of unavoidable and extraordinary circumstances within the meaning of Article 12(2) of that Directive and the organiser is declared insolvent after the termination of the package travel contract on that basis, but before those sums have actually been refunded to the traveller, as a result of which that traveller suffers a financial loss and consequently bears an economic risk in the event of the organiser’s liquidation?


(1)  OJ 2015 L 326, p. 1.


Top