This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CA0612
Case C-612/21, Gmina O.: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Gmina O. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2(1)(a) and (c) — Supply of goods and services for consideration — Article 9(1) — Meanings of ‘taxable person’ and ‘economic activity’ — Municipality which organises the installation of renewable energy on its territory for its residents who own immovable property and who have expressed the wish to be equipped with renewable energy systems — Their contribution amounting to 25 % of the subsidisable costs, without being able to exceed a maximum value agreed between the municipality and the interested property owner — Reimbursement of the municipality by a subsidy from the competent provincial authority of 75 % of the subsidisable costs — Article 13(1) — Municipalities not subject to tax for the activities or transactions carried out as public authorities)
Case C-612/21, Gmina O.: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Gmina O. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2(1)(a) and (c) — Supply of goods and services for consideration — Article 9(1) — Meanings of ‘taxable person’ and ‘economic activity’ — Municipality which organises the installation of renewable energy on its territory for its residents who own immovable property and who have expressed the wish to be equipped with renewable energy systems — Their contribution amounting to 25 % of the subsidisable costs, without being able to exceed a maximum value agreed between the municipality and the interested property owner — Reimbursement of the municipality by a subsidy from the competent provincial authority of 75 % of the subsidisable costs — Article 13(1) — Municipalities not subject to tax for the activities or transactions carried out as public authorities)
Case C-612/21, Gmina O.: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Gmina O. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — Value added tax (VAT) — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 2(1)(a) and (c) — Supply of goods and services for consideration — Article 9(1) — Meanings of ‘taxable person’ and ‘economic activity’ — Municipality which organises the installation of renewable energy on its territory for its residents who own immovable property and who have expressed the wish to be equipped with renewable energy systems — Their contribution amounting to 25 % of the subsidisable costs, without being able to exceed a maximum value agreed between the municipality and the interested property owner — Reimbursement of the municipality by a subsidy from the competent provincial authority of 75 % of the subsidisable costs — Article 13(1) — Municipalities not subject to tax for the activities or transactions carried out as public authorities)
OJ C 179, 22.5.2023, p. 4–5
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
22.5.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 179/4 |
Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 March 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Gmina O. v Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej
(Case C-612/21, (1) Gmina O.)
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 2(1)(a) and (c) - Supply of goods and services for consideration - Article 9(1) - Meanings of ‘taxable person’ and ‘economic activity’ - Municipality which organises the installation of renewable energy on its territory for its residents who own immovable property and who have expressed the wish to be equipped with renewable energy systems - Their contribution amounting to 25 % of the subsidisable costs, without being able to exceed a maximum value agreed between the municipality and the interested property owner - Reimbursement of the municipality by a subsidy from the competent provincial authority of 75 % of the subsidisable costs - Article 13(1) - Municipalities not subject to tax for the activities or transactions carried out as public authorities)
(2023/C 179/05)
Language of the case: Polish
Referring court
Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Gmina O.
Defendant: Dyrektor Krajowej Informacji Skarbowej
Operative part of the judgment
Article 2(1), Article 9(1) and Article 13(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax
must be interpreted as meaning that the fact that a municipality supplies and installs, through an undertaking, renewable energy systems for its residents who own their property and who have expressed their wish to be equipped with renewable energy systems, where such an activity is not intended to obtain income on a continuing basis and gives rise, on the part of those residents, solely to a payment covering at most one quarter of the costs incurred, the balance being financed by public funds, does not constitute a supply of goods and services subject to value added tax.