EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0153
Case T-153/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Bachmann v EUIPO (LIGHTYOGA) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark LIGHTYOGA — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-153/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Bachmann v EUIPO (LIGHTYOGA) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark LIGHTYOGA — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-153/20: Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Bachmann v EUIPO (LIGHTYOGA) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark LIGHTYOGA — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
OJ C 110, 29.3.2021, p. 29–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
29.3.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 110/29 |
Judgment of the General Court of 10 February 2021 — Bachmann v EUIPO (LIGHTYOGA)
(Case T-153/20) (1)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark LIGHTYOGA - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2021/C 110/32)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Gabriele Bachmann (Bad Grönenbach, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 December 2019 (Case R 2346/2019 2), concerning an application for registration of the word sign LIGHTYOGA as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Gabriele Bachmann to pay the costs. |