This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0096
Case T-96/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult v EUIPO (Limbic® Types) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Limbic® Types — Absolute grounds for refusal — Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court — Referral of the case back to the Grand Board of Appeal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Error of law — Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Res judicata — Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Composition of the Grand Board of Appeal)
Case T-96/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult v EUIPO (Limbic® Types) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Limbic® Types — Absolute grounds for refusal — Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court — Referral of the case back to the Grand Board of Appeal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Error of law — Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Res judicata — Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Composition of the Grand Board of Appeal)
Case T-96/20: Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult v EUIPO (Limbic® Types) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark Limbic® Types — Absolute grounds for refusal — Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court — Referral of the case back to the Grand Board of Appeal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Error of law — Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Res judicata — Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Composition of the Grand Board of Appeal)
OJ C 422, 18.10.2021, p. 13–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
18.10.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 422/13 |
Judgment of the General Court of 1 September 2021 — Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult v EUIPO (Limbic® Types)
(Case T-96/20) (1)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Limbic® Types - Absolute grounds for refusal - Decision taken following the annulment of an earlier decision by the General Court - Referral of the case back to the Grand Board of Appeal - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Error of law - Examination of the facts of the Office’s own motion - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Res judicata - Article 72(6) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Composition of the Grand Board of Appeal)
(2021/C 422/18)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2019 (Case R 1276/2017-G), concerning an application for registration of the word sign Limbic® Types as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the Grand Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 December 2019 (Case R 1276/2017-G); |
|
2. |
Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |