Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62020CN0480

    Case C-480/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 28 September 2020 — Sisal Entertainment SpA v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli

    OJ C 28, 25.1.2021, p. 14–15 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.1.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 28/14

    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato (Italy) lodged on 28 September 2020 — Sisal Entertainment SpA v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli

    (Case C-480/20)

    (2021/C 28/21)

    Language of the case: Italian

    Referring court

    Consiglio di Stato

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: Sisal Entertainment SpA

    Respondent: Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli

    Questions referred

    1.

    Is the introduction of a provision, such as that contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which reduces commission and fees only in respect of a specific and limited category of operator, namely operators of games played on gaming machines, and not all operators in the gaming sector, compatible with the exercise of the freedom of establishment guaranteed by Article 49 TFEU and with the exercise of the freedom to provide services guaranteed by Article 56 TFEU?

    2.

    Is the introduction of the abovementioned provision contained in Article 1(649) of Law 190/14, which for economic reasons alone reduced the fees agreed to in a concession agreement concluded between a company and an Italian State authority during the term of that agreement, compatible with the EU-law principle of the protection of legitimate expectations?
    Top