Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62022TN0130

    Case T-130/22: Action brought on 7 March 2022 — Biologische Heilmittel Heel v EUIPO — Esi (TRAUMGEL)

    OJ C 171, 25.4.2022, p. 34–35 (GA)
    OJ C 171, 25.4.2022, p. 44–45 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    25.4.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 171/44

    Action brought on 7 March 2022 — Biologische Heilmittel Heel v EUIPO — Esi (TRAUMGEL)

    (Case T-130/22)

    (2022/C 171/61)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH (Baden-Baden, Germany) (represented by: J. Künzel, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Esi Srl (Albisola Superiore, Italy)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark TRAUMGEL — Application for registration No 16 289 712

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 December 2021 in Case R 813/2021-4

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    annul the order No. 3 of the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal — R 813/2021-4 of 20 December 2021;

    —

    alter the order No. 1 of the contested decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal -R 813/2021-4 of 20 December 2021;

    —

    annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 6 April 2021 beyond the goods contained in the order No. 1 insofar as the opposition was rejected for goods in Class 3;

    —

    order the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO to pay the costs.

    Plea in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top