This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0552
Case T-552/20: Action brought on 2 September 2020 — MD v Commission
Case T-552/20: Action brought on 2 September 2020 — MD v Commission
Case T-552/20: Action brought on 2 September 2020 — MD v Commission
OJ C 371, 3.11.2020, p. 18–19
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
3.11.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 371/18 |
Action brought on 2 September 2020 — MD v Commission
(Case T-552/20)
(2020/C 371/21)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Applicant: MD (represented by: A. Ricci, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul the contested decision; |
— |
order the Commission to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
The present action is brought against the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 14 during the 2019 promotion exercise (Administrative Notice No 32-2019 of 14.11.2019).
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging failure to state sufficient reasons in the decision rejecting his complaint. The applicant raises in this regard:
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 45 of the Staff Regulations, in particular on account of the absence of actual consideration of the comparative merits of the officials. The applicant raises in this regard:
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging age discrimination in relation to the alleged ‘practical effect’ of every promotion. The applicant raises in this regard:
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 6(2) of the Staff Regulations. The applicant raises in this regard:
|