This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TN0442
Case T-442/20: Action brought on 13 July 2020 — Grangé and Van Strydonck v EUIPO — Nema (âme)
Case T-442/20: Action brought on 13 July 2020 — Grangé and Van Strydonck v EUIPO — Nema (âme)
Case T-442/20: Action brought on 13 July 2020 — Grangé and Van Strydonck v EUIPO — Nema (âme)
OJ C 297, 7.9.2020, p. 46–46
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
7.9.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 297/46 |
Action brought on 13 July 2020 — Grangé and Van Strydonck v EUIPO — Nema (âme)
(Case T-442/20)
(2020/C 297/60)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: Isaline Grangé (Edegem, Belgium) and Alizée Van Strydonck (Strombeek-Bever, Belgium) (represented by: M. De Vroey, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nema Srl (San Lazzaro di Savena, Italy)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicants of the trade mark at issue: Applicants before the General Court
Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark âme — Application for registration No 17 895 139
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 June 2020 in Case R 2960/2019-4
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO and any intervener to pay the costs. |
Plea in law
|
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |