Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020CN0289

    Case C-289/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris (France) lodged on 30 June 2020 — IB v FA

    OJ C 297, 7.9.2020, p. 34–34 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    7.9.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 297/34


    Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Paris (France) lodged on 30 June 2020 — IB v FA

    (Case C-289/20)

    (2020/C 297/45)

    Language of the case: French

    Referring court

    Cour d’appel de Paris

    Parties to the main proceedings

    Appellant: IB

    Respondent: FA

    Question referred

    Where, as in the present case, it is apparent from the factual circumstances that one of the spouses divides his time between two Member States, is it permissible to conclude, in accordance with and for the purposes of the application of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003, (1) that he or she is habitually resident in two Member States, such that, if the conditions listed in that article are met in two Member States, the courts of those two States have equal jurisdiction to rule on the divorce?


    (1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (OJ 2003 L 338, p. 1).


    Top