Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016CA0378

    Case C-378/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2020 — Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE v European Commission (Appeal — Arbitration clause — Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) and of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) — MARE, Senior and ECRN projects — Commission decision to recover sums unduly paid — Jurisdiction of the EU judicature)

    OJ C 297, 7.9.2020, p. 2–2 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    7.9.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 297/2


    Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 16 July 2020 — Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE v European Commission

    (Case C-378/16 P) (1)

    (Appeal - Arbitration clause - Grant agreements concluded in the context of the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) and of the Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme (2007-2013) - MARE, Senior and ECRN projects - Commission decision to recover sums unduly paid - Jurisdiction of the EU judicature)

    (2020/C 297/02)

    Language of the case: Italian

    Parties

    Appellant: Inclusion Alliance for Europe GEIE (represented by: A. D’Amico and S. Famiani, avvocati)

    Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented initially by F. Moro, S. Delaude and L. Di Paolo, and subsequently by F. Moro and S. Delaude, acting as Agents, and by D. Gullo, avvocato)

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 21 April 2016, Inclusion Alliance for Europe v Commission (T-539/13, not published, EU:T:2016:235);

    2.

    Refers Case T-539/13 back to the General Court of the European Union;

    3.

    Reserves the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 326, 5.9.2016.


    Top