This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CB0390
Case C-390/19 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — Italian Republic v European Commission, French Republic, Hungary (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) — European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Sugar sector — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic — Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded)
Case C-390/19 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — Italian Republic v European Commission, French Republic, Hungary (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) — European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Sugar sector — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic — Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded)
Case C-390/19 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — Italian Republic v European Commission, French Republic, Hungary (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) — European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Sugar sector — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic — Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded)
OJ C 287, 31.8.2020, p. 17–18
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
31.8.2020 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 287/17 |
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — Italian Republic v European Commission, French Republic, Hungary
(Case C-390/19 P) (1)
(Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) - European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) - Sugar sector - Expenditure excluded from EU financing - Expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic - Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded)
(2020/C 287/25)
Language of the case: Italian
Parties
Appellant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, assisted by C. Colelli and M.F. Severi, avvocatti dello Stato)
Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and B. Hofstötter, acting as Agents), French Republic, Hungary
Operative part of the order
1. |
The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded. |
2. |
The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs. |